Cloudinspector Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Saw this at Hebden Bridge at the weekend. Can anyone shed any light on it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proper Job Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 The bow looks like an icebreaker to me, but there will be people on here who will identify it down to the planking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junior Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 That looks like the one that was for sale on AD for a good portion of this year. If so it's had a mention, and there is a bit of info on it in the 'Historic Boats For Sale' thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete harrison Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 That looks like the one that was for sale on AD for a good portion of this year. If so it's had a mention, and there is a bit of info on it in the 'Historic Boats For Sale' thread. Yes, this boat has been discussed within this thread. It is the wooden Ice Boat AUTHERLEY - last advertised on Apollo Duck in June 2014. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Dunkley Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Saw this at Hebden Bridge at the weekend. Can anyone shed any light on it?? No I can't . . . apart from the fact that it's very badly tied up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnetman Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Very badly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FadeToScarlet Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 No I can't . . . apart from the fact that it's very badly tied up. Not sure I follow, the back end line might introduce a bit of roll if the boat surges backwards because of the angle of the fore end line, which I probably wouldn't have put out, but it's on rings with nice car wheels to save it scraping on anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proper Job Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 It's tied bow, stern and centre with car tyres It seems well tied up to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Dunkley Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 (edited) Very badly? Not sure I follow, the back end line might introduce a bit of roll if the boat surges backwards because of the angle of the fore end line, which I probably wouldn't have put out, but it's on rings with nice car wheels to save it scraping on anything? It's tied bow, stern and centre with car tyres It seems well tied up to me Fore- end line is slack and the 'lead' won't prevent boat fore and aft movement when another boat passes. Same re. line on back end rail, and that tatty old bit of thin blue polypropylene from the chimney side dolly, which isn't up to the job anyway. If the boat was moved back a bit and positioned with a ring( the one the line from the back end rail is on) one third to a half of the length along the cabin/engineroom from the counter and lines made off tight from the back end rail and the dolly to that one same ring, finishing off with the fore-end being made off tight (to the same ring as in the pictures) then there wouldn't be any movement possible when anything else goes past. Edited November 19, 2014 by Tony Dunkley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stilllearning Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 It's inconsiderate of the boat behind it to be moored so that Tony Dunkley's suggestion cannot be tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnetman Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 l wouldn't call that 'very badly' maybe just 'badly' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Dunkley Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 It's inconsiderate of the boat behind it to be moored so that Tony Dunkley's suggestion cannot be tried. In fact there is room to do exactly as I said, but if there wasn't, then transferring the back end rail line to the ring at the stern end and running another line from the fore-end ring to the back end rail would achieve the same. There is also the third option of two lines from the ring by the back end rail with one to the dolly and the other to the T-stud. The essential point is to prevent the back and forth surging of a moored boat that's caused by the 'draw' of water when another boat passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now