canalboater2012 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 I will more than likely be slattered for posting this post about the "shroppie" again as people think am promoting Tattenhall marina. but i was out today and got into conversation at the marina with a fellow moorer. he said he had spent the night moored outside the cheshire cat pub at Waverton and this morning he had been hit by a guy reversing his boat back to the winding hole by bridge 121 Christleton. i asked why didnt the boater just cruise to egg bridge winding hole to wind. I was told that you cant wind there as it has signs to say you cant and is no longer a designated winding hole....anyone any ideas???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snigsnig Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 I think it stopped being a winding hole when the apartments were built there. I've heard of some residents complaining to boaters mooring up opposite too. Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canalboater2012 Posted December 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Aww right I've moored there a few times.the people who buy theses new apartments need to remember the canal was there before them!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pentargon Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Aww right I've moored there a few times.the people who buy theses new apartments need to remember the canal was there before them!!! As licence holders we have a RIGHT to navigate and moor as we wish without let or hindrance from canal side residents who have no rights whatever at law. No more than people who live on the side of a road have a right to warn or advise people to pass quietly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canalboater2012 Posted December 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Exactly next time I come out of the marina for a short cruise next Sat now depending on the ice iam going to cruise up past the 2 miles thought shanty town " golden knook " & wind at egg bridge then ill more up & run the engine & may even get the generator out to add salt to the womb!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Smith Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 I've turned there before - it's a bit tight especially when idiots (C&RT) moor up directly opposite in the bridge 'ole. I believe someone took out a newly installed fence/wall there once which resulted in a complaint to BW. A certain woman has been known to run out and shout every now an again if she see's someone turning! Can't see a problem if you take care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazboatman Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 Aww right I've moored there a few times.the people who buy theses new apartments need to remember the canal was there before them!!! Sounds simiar to the problem I'm having in Granary Wharf Leeds... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snigsnig Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) Its a shame that the residents now seem to view the canal as little more than a glorified duck pond. Neil Edited December 3, 2012 by snigsnig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinl Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 Exactly next time I come out of the marina for a short cruise next Sat now depending on the ice iam going to cruise up past the 2 miles thought shanty town " golden knook " & wind at egg bridge then ill more up & run the engine & may even get the generator out to add salt to the womb!!! Sorry "add salt to the womb" surely you mean "wound". Why would you want to add salt to a womb, de-ice it possibly? Answers on a postcard please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canalboater2012 Posted December 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 Kevin have I upset you or you just being an absolute A**e for the fun. Iam dyslexic hence the bad way with words Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dor Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 When was Egg Bridge officially a winding hole? As I understand it, it is/was a private wharf and not an official winding hole, and as such is effectively "private water". My old 2003 Nicholsons doesn't show it as a winding hole, and Nicholsons has a reputation for putting in winding holes anywhere it thought the canal is a bit wider than normal. Some private winding holes have signs up saying "winding by permission of the owner" presumably to prevent winding becoming a right. As for mooring up opposite houses, that is a completely different matter! Whenever I see those signs, like the ones at Waverton, It always tempts me to stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeco Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 (edited) Last year around this time we arrived at the bottom lock at blackburn to find the bottom pound drained and we havn't seen another boater for miles and all the vandle locks were locked. It took us all day to get to the top as when we drained one pound to fill the other and so on. At this time of year with not many people on the system the locks must leak. Edited December 3, 2012 by leeco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 This "designated winding hole" business bemuses me. Juno is only 23 feet long and can be turned almost anywhere, but does that mean that I am not allowed to turn her unless at a winding hole? How does that work with 60 footer on the Gloucester and Sharpness? (similar situation, but on a bigger scale) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machpoint005 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 >> I am dyslexic hence the bad way with words So is the 'US English' spellchecker, unfortunately. It can't spell whisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Marshall Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 As for mooring up opposite houses, that is a completely different matter! Whenever I see those signs, like the ones at Waverton, It always tempts me to stop. Unless it's all been improved, the only place you can moor at Waverton is opposite the houses - everywhere else is too shallow. And it's the last shop for miles going south. The "wharf", last time I looked, had some nice bollards and a sign saying reserved for BW boats and the disabled boat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchcrawler Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 Kevin have I upset you or you just being an absolute A**e for the fun. Iam dyslexic hence the bad way with words Dont worry about it canalboater, there is always some bright spark to pick people up. I cant spell to save my life and rely totally on the spell checker but they sometimes puts the wrong word in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalesman Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 When was Egg Bridge officially a winding hole? As I understand it, it is/was a private wharf and not an official winding hole, and as such is effectively "private water". My old 2003 Nicholsons doesn't show it as a winding hole, and Nicholsons has a reputation for putting in winding holes anywhere it thought the canal is a bit wider than normal. Some private winding holes have signs up saying "winding by permission of the owner" presumably to prevent winding becoming a right. As for mooring up opposite houses, that is a completely different matter! Whenever I see those signs, like the ones at Waverton, It always tempts me to stop. This was never a winding hole but the mooring basin for "Holidaymakers (Cheshire)" Waverton Mill,Eggbridge Lane Waverton.The other side of the bridge was "Eggbridge Marine", they also had GRP hire boats and a slipway.Anyone remember them..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIke Rimmer Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 (edited) I remember Eggbridge being a wharfe. However for the last 25yrs at least it has been used for winding and is recorded as such on both of my Nicholsons guides. I was there on Sunday around 10am. I turned in to be met with a black and white sign, in the Canal and River Trust format but minus the logo, which stated NO WINDING. Of course I had already turned in prior to reading the sign so I continued to wind much to the annoyance of some local busybody who came flying out of his house to remonstrate. He wasnt in the mood to listen and would not answer when I asked who had put the sign up. I finished winding and carried on, much to his annoyance. My question is.......who is responsible for the sign? I have sent off an equiry to the CRT and await their response. In the meantime I shall continue to wind there since my little 42' boat fits nicely. and caused no trouble to anyone. Just a thought but what if f my boat was 30' and would wind at that site but whithout going onto the actual winding hole? I will keep you informed if and when the CRT get back to me. Mike Edited January 15, 2013 by MIke Rimmer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathanA Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 (edited) I remember Eggbridge being a wharfe. However for the last 25yrs at least it has been used for winding and is recorded as such on both of my Nicholsons guides. I was there on Sunday around 10am. I turned in to be met with a black and white sign, in the Canal and River Trust format but minus the logo, which stated NOW WINDING. Of course I had already turned in prior to reading the sign so I continued to wind much to the annoyance of some local busybody who came flying out of his house to remonstrate. He wasnt in the mood to listen and would not answer when I asked who had put the sign up. I finished winding and carried on, much to his annoyance. My question is.......who is responsible for the sign? I have sent off an equiry to the CRT and await their response. In the meantime I shall continue to wind there since my little 42' boat fits nicely. and caused no trouble to anyone. Just a thought but wahatif my boat was 30' and would wind at that site but whithout going onto the actual winding hole? I will keep you informed if and when the CRT get back to me. Mike my response to people who say you can't wind/moor up here is the same as the ones who run out and say 'you can't park there'... I reply with a friendly smile saying 'I'll think you'll find I just have' .... Edited January 14, 2013 by jonathanA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 If a boat fits in then anywhere is a winding hole. Since when were there officially designated turning points? A winding hole is merely a wider lump of canal. my response to people who say you can't wind/moor up here is the same as the ones who run out and say 'you can't park there'... It's the ones that have their own set of traffic cones to obstruct the highway outside their house that amuse me the most. If I'm in a good mood I'll get out, move the cones onto the idiot's front garden then park but, if I'm feeling a bit grumpy then the cones get squashed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
little duck! Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 we moored there just before the bridge last August. There was a sign saying reserved for BW boats (obviously hadn't changed the sign then) but we moored a litle further back, opposite the new flats. As we were on the towpath side we were within our rights. No problems but someones comments about the local duckpond ring true. Someone came out of ther flats and emptied their cereal packet into the canal and whereas that doesn't bother me the ducks are obviously used to the regular feeding spot - this is the noisiest place we have stayed we were rudely awakened by a large group (sorry i cant remember the collective word for ducks is it flock or is that geese?) of ducks early the next morning eagerly waiting their next feed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStringPudding Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 The collective noun is a Cantonese Slow Roast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 Someone came out of ther flats and emptied their cereal packet into the canal ... In direct contravention of Byelaw 40: No person shall throw or discharge into or on to any canal any animal (whether alive or dead) or any rubbish, stones or other material of any kind whatsoever or deposit such materials so as to be washed or carried into any canal by floods or other means, or in any wise cause obstruction in any canal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luctor et emergo Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 The collective noun is a Cantonese Slow Roast very good (can't do clapping smiley on phone..) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul C Posted January 15, 2013 Report Share Posted January 15, 2013 I remember Eggbridge being a wharfe. However for the last 25yrs at least it has been used for winding and is recorded as such on both of my Nicholsons guides. I was there on Sunday around 10am. I turned in to be met with a black and white sign, in the Canal and River Trust format but minus the logo, which stated NO WINDING. Of course I had already turned in prior to reading the sign so I continued to wind much to the annoyance of some local busybody who came flying out of his house to remonstrate. He wasnt in the mood to listen and would not answer when I asked who had put the sign up. I finished winding and carried on, much to his annoyance. My question is.......who is responsible for the sign? I have sent off an equiry to the CRT and await their response. In the meantime I shall continue to wind there since my little 42' boat fits nicely. and caused no trouble to anyone. Just a thought but what if f my boat was 30' and would wind at that site but whithout going onto the actual winding hole? I will keep you informed if and when the CRT get back to me. Mike It looks like an official sign, is it? How on earth can they enforce it? And HOW ON EARTH DID YOU MISS IT BEFORE WINDING!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now