Higgs

As I said, the chargers make no distinction.

Which made the previous part of your post irrelevant. But the current charging system hits CCers. No distinction is made between CCers and CMers. And some home moorers are trying to claim privileges attached to the licence. I think they should check their mooring contracts.

Well, there's no law that says anyone needs a 'formal' mooring, there's no extra added value to a mooring contract, and I know you're taking the piss. You won't be reading this post, because you are intolerant, and appear to be a bigot.

There's no need for a 'formal' mooring.

One poster wrote this: "The CC surcharge on the license fee goes at least part-way to correcting this anomaly (and increases CART income), and simply means that everyone -- CCer or CMer or HMer or EOGer -- pays a similar amount to CART. Or at least CCers don't continue to pay less -- some HMers who pay CART directly or via EOG obviously pay much more. It's a bit like closing a historical tax loophole that some people have taken advantage of but now protest when this is corrected... 😉" The only reason HMers and EoG moorers pay more than CCers is because they are paying for exclusive moorings. They pay extra for the extra they choose to have. Moorings do not come for free. That is why they pay more, they have more. And both home moorers and EoG moorers should now be liable to be included in the PAYG culture when they are not on their moorings, that a lot seem to think should apply to CCers. I think the mentality of some home moorers is: They think CCers should be liable to pay Hmers and EoG moorers some kind of indirect subsidy. People that moor in marinas pay 9% of their mooring fee to the marina, so that the marina can pay one of its overheads to CRT. There's absolutely no connection there between the moorer and CRT. There's no directly paying anything to CRT by those moorers. EoG moorers have a mooring contract liability. End of. IanD and some moorers are full of BS entitlement delusions.